Post Update – 6 April 2014

Hello, world.

So I have been relatively silent on here recently. There are a few reasons.

One reason is that I’ve had so many different ideas for posts, and have been rushing onto WordPress to start them, and preserve them for future postings as blog posts. The problem is, now I have a handful of unfinished posts that I just need to finished. I currently count four that I need to finish at some point.

Another reason is that the past month was a busy time for me. I turned 25, went through a quarter-life crisis with my choice of librarianship as a career, but then ended up in Vegas, which was fun, and then re-solidified my professional intentions. Now we’re back to normal, albeit more clear.

And, well, things have been crazy busy at the law firm where I work, as you can see.

One final excuse is how introverted and reclusive I tend to be nowadays.  It came down on me like a ton of fucking bricks the past month.  But now I’m fine.

And the posts will keep coming.

 

Books vs. E-Readers? Arguments for both

One recurring (and recurring and recurring and recurring…ugh…) topic of discussion within library circles is the longevity of library resources in paper format.  In other words, how long are books going to be around?  And what impact does this have on libraries?

Since e-books rose in popularity less than a decade ago, there has been an increase in the desire for books to be published in electronic format, in addition to the customarily bound paper volume in hardcover, paperback, leaked Word doc (oops), etc.  Whether it’s Kindle, Nook, Kobo, or any number of model made by Sony, this manner of reading has revolutionized mass consumption of reading material.  Even certain textbooks are becoming digital, alleviating the need to lug that 300-ton backpack around anymore.  E-books and e-readers are definitely popular electronics.  According to the Pew Research Center, one in every two adults now owns either a tablet or e-reader.

This begs the question: if we have books available in e-reader format, then what’s the point of publishing a physical book anymore?  While it’s physically impossible for someone to literally carry around 100 books of whatever shape and size, one e-reader can carry more than 100 books as electronic files.  I can also download an e-book with the click of a mouse, without the need for going to a bookstore or a library.  In the off chance that I decide to dabble in 50 Shades of Grey readership (which, for this author, is less likely than me taking a trip to Mars anytime soon), I can read it on the bus or on a park bench or at McDonald’s without getting weird looks from people.  No paper, no sore backs, no judgmental people.  Cool, huh?

So why do we need books?  Moreover, why do we even need libraries?

When you think about it, though, any of the advantages to e-readers are for convenience’s sake.  Faster, cheaper, and more, right?  However, the argument that e-readers will overthrow books and lead to the demise of libraries makes some assumptions.  Firstly, it assumes that people can afford to purchase an e-reader, and to purchase e-books as they feel led.  Believe it or not, some people can’t afford home access to the Internet, much less an e-reader or the ability to buy books at a whim.  Secondly, it assumes that e-readers are user-friendly and easy to figure out how to use.  Let’s face it: there are people in this world who completely suck at using technology, and always will.  E-readers are no exception.  Finally, technology updates itself every 3 seconds, which makes things difficult if e-book files are incompatible with your e-reader because it’s too old.  And vice versa.  Hell, there are certain computer games from the early 90s that people can’t play on a Windows 7 machine anymore.

Funny thing is, not only are regular, physical books still relevant, but so are libraries.  Pew Research Center tells us so, and another thing it tells us is that the last thing people want is the removal of books from public library spaces.  The public library still has a major impact on the community, and is still regarded as a safe place for kids to go, for which mothers thank you.

And whither physical books?

Well, let’s think about this logically.  E-readers are less than a quarter-century old in their ubiquitousness, and yet books have been in continuous existence and usage for nearly 600 years.  Secondly, books are insanely easy to use: open the book, make sure the book is right-side up, read the page, turn the page and read the next one, until you finish reading the book.  Simple as that.  Thirdly, books are less expensive in the long run.  Maybe that $17 brand-new hardcover John Grisham novel is a little out of your price range yet, but either you can check it out from the library, or wait until the mass-market paperback comes out for $8 or so, or even better yet, wait for the hardcover to appear in a second-hand bookstore for even less expensive.  That’s not something you can do with e-books (at least, not all the time and not legally).  Physical books are also less expensive for physical libraries: what you lack in space, you make up for by paying a one-time charge for the book, ever.  By way of contrast, libraries purchase not an e-book itself for public usage, but a license to allow the book to be checked out, without ever owning the book.  And why?  Well…you can blame publishing companies for that, at least for now and at least most of them.  (If you click on the link and read the article, you’ll see that Simon and Schuster is trying to help.  There is some good in this world.)

If you own an e-reader, good for you.  I’m slightly inclined to buy one myself, but just because I tire of most people asking me, “Whatcha readin’?”  Keep in mind, though, that e-readers are not replacing books anytime soon (if at all).  Both are going to be around for a long time.  And that’s a good thing, because there’s nothing better than free choice.

The Ukrainian Crisis explained

The library theme of this blog notwithstanding, my undergraduate background in international relations has been itching to come out and play, given the situation with Russia and Ukraine.  Click here for the latest from BBC World News.

The Ukraine and Russia have an interesting history of relations.  To keep things modern (and without delving too far back into history to discuss, say, Kievan Rus), as most people know, Ukraine was part of the former USSR, and declared independence in 1991 upon the crumble of said USSR.  Easy enough, right?  Well, not really…

There are two things that make this pretty complicated.  Firstly, the current state of Ukraine is approximately 75% Ukrainian and 25% Russian.  When Ukraine declared independence, the 75% Ukrainian population rejoiced, while the 25% Russian population was not such a big fan.  Neither was Russia a big fan of them declaring independence either, due to the Russians living in Ukraine.  Even Russians living abroad (albeit in exile), such as the late Alexander Solzhenitsyn, wasn’t a big fan of it.  On the same token, Russia is usually pretty sensitive about its nationals living abroad, as well as those it considers its allies (although it can complicate things, such as the Syrian crisis or Serbia with regards to Kosovo).  It’s kind of the same type of nerves US states with their residents living in Texas would have if Texas were to follow through with its secession threats from 2012.  Simply put: Russia is worried about its Russians.

Secondly–and the main reason why Russia is currently worried about its Russians in Ukraine–Ukraine has had a volatile political environment and culture since its independence.  Ukraine’s presidents have been consistently accused of corruption, which has led to not one, but two abdications of power by the president.  But, this isn’t really specific to Ukraine by any means: in reality, Ukraine, much like any of the former SSRs who knew nothing of democracy or a free-market economy prior to the 1990s, is experiencing similar growing pains.  (Believe it or not, Russia is also part of this group.)  So, Ukraine is still trying to find its feet with regards to maintaining a stable democratic society.  

As an aside, Americans might look at this and say, “Man, are these people screwed up!  Why the hell can’t they figure things out, like we have?”  Well, first off, Ukraine has only been a unitary republic since 1991, and secondly, the US has been a republic for 238 years, and it still hasn’t figured things out!

Finally, and here’s where some intense international relations lingo comes into play, Russia is what’s known as a regional hegemon.  In other words, Russia wants to use its status as a military, economic and geographic power to control the countries around it.  It worked with Finland throughout the Cold War.  However, it’s a lot easier said than done, given that similar things can be said for China, India, Turkey, the European Union, and even the United States.  Nonetheless, when Russia wants to create de facto control over Ukraine–by virtue of Ukraine neighboring Russia, as well as most of Russia’s gas pipelines going through Ukraine and Russia providing foreign aid to Ukraine.  Nonetheless, this hegemony has its rivals.  That Ukrainian/Russian split I mentioned before?  Well, the Western half of Ukraine leans more towards the policies of the West (e.g. the US and the European Union), whereas the Eastern half (where most of Ukraine’s Russians also live) tends to lean towards Russia.  So not only is there is polarization coming externally from Russia, but also internally from the division of its people towards hegemonic devotion.

When all this adds up, we have Russia mobilizing its troops into the Crimea, Ukraine mobilizing its troops in response, and the whole world now watching to see what Russia does.  This type of thing happened most recently in 2008 with the South Ossetian crisis between Russia and Georgia.  The responsibility for what happens next is shared: Russia is responsible for how it uses its hegemonic power, Ukraine is responsible for how it responds to Russia, and the rest of the world is responsible for how it perceives the crisis.

A Note on Greater Utilization of Blogs (namely, my own)

So I created this blog on a whim back in December 2013, and then despite starting a blog post about a week’s readings in one of my classes, I neither completed that post nor posted again.  However, given that blogs can be a worthwhile medium for marketing one’s self, and for adding to the discussion of whatever-you-desire, I figure that I should start making posts here on a regular basis.

So here we are.

In reality, I was also inspired by a post on INALJ about using a presence on the Internet to enhance one’s professional identity.  It got me to thinking: all sorts of people, library professionals included, use blog posts as a way to discuss their feelings about current events and other contemporary trends, like the bullcrap going on with Apple and e-books.  (I side with the U.S. on the issue, surprisingly.)  In addition, it’s a great way to market yourself in general.  (“Hello, nice to meet you!”  “You as well!”  “What types of professional activities are you involved in?”  “Well, I run a blog, among other things.”)

This is not to say that having a blog will guarantee you a spot in the highest professional echelon in your field.  It’s not the blog that makes the man (or woman), folks.  Nonetheless, it fills a gap that Facebook and Twitter otherwise leave vacant: to not only speak your mind, but also to do so in your very own way.

And, from a practical standpoint, as Anastasia Gould writes in the INALJ blog post, it’s also a good way to show people, “Hey, I know how technology works, and how to use it!”  In a world that is increasingly accepting digital formats for stuff (soon, we’ll be able to stick a piece of bread into a small space and it becomes toasted–no more fork-induced electrocutions!), this marketing tool is more crucial.

Maybe your problem, like me, is that you’re not quite sure what to write for any blog post.  No matter!  You don’t have to treat every single blog post like they’re the Great American Novel.  Samuel Clemens certainly wasn’t mindful of that.  He wrote about what he felt like, and about what he thought of things.  Anything can be created from nothing, in a creative sense (think the law of conservation of energy).  See something in the news that just made you want to hit the wall?  Or did you find something really really cool that you want to share?  Or did you have some random thought in your head that seemed to aggregate into a complete argument or soliloquy in an instant?  I rest my case.

So, back to me.  I will attempt to use this blog space a lot more often than before.  I’ll go for, maybe, once a week.  I’ll try to cut down on the swearing, but the satirical language you’ll have to deal with it.  That you’re reading this right now means that you’re willing to put up with it, for my sake, at least.

An Introduction

So I’m currently in my third semester (out of a planned six) of study in the Master of Library and Information Science program at Saint Catherine University.  There are already a few things I’ve figured out.

First, I need a place where I can just bullshit to my heart’s content, without fear of direct repercussion and within reason, on the subject of the library and information science field, or LIS field for short.  I don’t know how many times I’ve come up with some theory or random thought, but had no outlet at the time or forgot about it.  Plus, everyone needs a place to just let it all out.  Thus, this blog.

Second, I do come up with a lot of stuff of my own intuition and of my own impulse.  Most of it could very well be organized quite nicely, while the rest is simply nothing but unorganized stream-of-consciousness ranting or bitching, or anything else.  As of 10 December 2013, I’m enrolled in a class that makes regular use of the Discussion boards for the class’s page on the electronic class management database known as Desire2Learn, or D2L.  At first, I dismissed it as tedious busywork, but began to value the boards as a place to put things out there.  It’s a great way to practice written communication, and trust me, librarians are largely very, very good at written communication, compared to spoken communication.

Finally, I seem to have begun developing a personal philosophy with regards to the LIS field.  Now, this philosophy is theoretical at best, since my only experience with libraries, besides this graduate program, consists of volunteering at my neighborhood library as a child, working in the campus library at UW-Barron County during my sophomore year of college, and the endless hours I spent in the library, whether studying, shelf-browsing, or simply to get away.  Nonetheless, the further along one goes through a program like this, the greater the necessity for a personal philosophy regarding the subject of the program.  It helps to have one, or else the studies become simply a tool, with no life of their own.  The student, in tandem, simply goes through the motions, putting no thought into what he/she studies or reads and why.  Therefore, my personal philosophy regarding libraries, librarians, library history and everything else is something I hope to start materializing into a coherent body of work, using this blog as a canvas.

This blog, of course, will contain other things.  I will put book reviews on here (mostly library related, but I can’t make any promises).  I will put my analysis of class readings on here, more for my own benefit, but feel free to read them, for overall literacy.  I will link to other things I find cool or interesting or awesome or stupid or otherwise, although I’ll try to avoid unnecessary postings of newspaper articles.

Think of it as a mixture between a professional work log, a personal diary, and a soap box.  Let’s face it; we all need a soap box or outlet of some kind.

I hope you read, I hope you think as a result, and I hope you enjoy.  Comments are welcome.